Bitcoin’s Shifting Role Sees It Mirror Gold, But the Four-Year Cycle Theory Casts a Long Shadow

Chip Somodevilla—Getty Images

Bitcoin, the world’s largest cryptocurrency, recently achieved a significant milestone, climbing to a multi-month high. This surge, which saw its price briefly touch $82,262 on Thursday before settling around $79,800 on Friday afternoon, marks a notable shift in investor perception. For much of early June, the digital asset had been confined to a trading range between $60,000 and $70,000, a period of relative stagnation following its peak above $126,000 last October. The recent breakout suggests a renewed confidence among some investors, who appear to be re-evaluating Bitcoin’s utility beyond its traditional classification as a high-risk tech-related asset.

André Dragosch, Bitwise’s director of research for Europe, highlighted this evolving narrative in a recent client note. He observed that investors are increasingly treating Bitcoin as a store of value, akin to gold, rather than a speculative tech stock. This reclassification aligns with a broader macroeconomic context, particularly concerns surrounding potential “financial repression.” These fears intensified after Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent proposed a plan to increase Treasury buybacks of long-dated bonds, a move that coincided with 30-year yields reaching nearly two-decade highs and elevated inflation forecasts, partly fueled by the ongoing conflict in Iran. In response to these developments, Bitcoin’s 90-day correlation with gold has approached a six-year peak, according to Dragosch’s analysis, indicating a notable departure from its earlier behavior this year, when it largely tracked risk-on assets like technology stocks.

Dragosch further elaborated on this dynamic, suggesting that “when things get serious and macro forces are strong, investors are discriminating less and less between bitcoin and gold as they navigate rising currency debasement risks.” He posited that in such scenarios, Bitcoin has begun to resemble an “amplified version of gold,” implying that its price movements might magnify the trends seen in the traditional safe-haven metal. This perspective suggests a maturation of the cryptocurrency, potentially offering an alternative hedge against economic uncertainties for a growing segment of the investment community.

However, this apparent shift towards a more stable, gold-like behavior might not be uniformly positive for the broader market. Dragosch cautioned that the last instance of such a close correlation between Bitcoin and the U.S. dollar occurred in 2020, a period characterized by extensive global central bank stimulus and quantitative easing in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. This historical parallel introduces a layer of complexity, prompting questions about the underlying economic conditions that might be driving Bitcoin’s current trajectory.

Adding another dimension to the discussion, some market participants point to the persistent influence of the four-year cycle theory, which could temper enthusiasm for sustained upward momentum. This theory posits that Bitcoin’s bear market lows and bull market tops tend to recur at approximate four-year intervals. According to Fidelity’s fourth-quarter crypto market outlook, if this pattern holds, the next bear market bottom could materialize around November, four years after the last recorded bottom in November 2022. The theory is partly linked to Bitcoin’s halving events, which periodically reduce the rewards paid to miners for validating transactions and maintaining the blockchain.

Alex Thorn, Galaxy’s head of firmwide research, is among the proponents of the four-year cycle theory. In a June report, Thorn suggested that “the historical analogies suggest a base case bottom for the current drawdown between $40k-46k occurring sometime between now and Q4 2026,” though he carefully noted this was not a definitive price prediction. While the theory presents a compelling historical framework, Chris Kuiper, vice president of research at Fidelity Digital Assets, offered a more nuanced view in the same fourth-quarter market outlook. Kuiper emphasized that the timing of the four-year cycle theory is not exact, implying that a downslide later this year is not a foregone conclusion. He concluded that “having a long-term perspective and holding period is what has historically been the most beneficial for investors,” underscoring the enduring importance of a patient strategy in the volatile cryptocurrency market, regardless of short-term correlations or cyclical predictions.

Keep Up to Date with the Most Important News

By pressing the Subscribe button, you confirm that you have read and are agreeing to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use